Why Java Doesn't Need Operator Overloading (and Very Few Languages

BCS none at anon.com
Wed Apr 15 08:50:24 PDT 2009


Hello Yigal,


> sounds silly to me. Why not simply generalize and allow defining
> in-fix functions like in functional languages? that also includes allowing
> any unicode character[s].

lexing and (more importantly) parsing become a major problem if you allow that





More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list