Fully dynamic d by opDotExp overloading

[Leandro Lucarella]

Steven Schveighoffer, el 17 de abril a las 11:27 me escribiste:
> >The problem is you're dealing with the class which is overloaded its opDot. You know the risk before hand, you are not going to overload for every classes. 
> >Here, you seem to little bit overrate this feature. :)
> >If you want things checked, then you probabely need to go back to static. This dynamic stuff is used for dynamic things only, and as long as you have to do 
> >it in the dynamic way that means you have no easy way or even impossible to check it at compiletime and you accept the potential risk like the example you 
> >posted.
> 
> Sure, but what is the reason to need dynamic methods?  I'm just trying to understand the usefulness of it.

RPC is an example that comes into mind

There is plenty of magic you can do with dynamic methods. Just try
a dynamic language and see =)

-- 
Leandro Lucarella (luca) | Blog colectivo: http://www.mazziblog.com.ar/blog/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145  104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corrí muchas carreras, tratando de alcanzarte a vos.
Pero corría sólo y siempre salí último.