Fully dynamic d by opDotExp overloading

[BCS]

Hello BCS,

That didn't sound like I intended it to so...

Clarification: I think most of us could convince most of the rest of us of 
the our point given face time because I don't think there are near as many 
opposing views as it seems. (That is with points of operation, not with issues 
of syntax and or inclusion of features for which there will never be agreement 
;)

> [ot] the annoying thing about this whole thread is that I'd bet a
> small amount of money that I could convince anyone here of my point in
> about 5 minuets if I had me, them and a chalkboard in the same room.

About 3 minutes me to figure out what they are arguing and about 2 minutes 
to show how what I'm arguing is orthogonal to it.

> I think almost all the confusion is not because people would disagree
> with what I'm trying to say but because there are about 5 different
> and almost unconnected things people are arguing about: a sort of "A
> is true"/"No, B is true" where A != B and A != !B and !A != B ...
> 
> Written language has the advantage that you can be very precise and
> thought out but has zero real time feedback like you get in a
> face-to-face and an insanely long delay for what feedback it does
> have.
>