D2 weak references
Leandro Lucarella
llucax at gmail.com
Wed Apr 22 07:43:21 PDT 2009
Jason House, el 21 de abril a las 21:11 me escribiste:
> Another alternative I came up with is notification when the GC clears or sets
> a mark on an object. That would allow the weak ref to know that its
> information is suspect. That approach would only required that the mark
> phase is done with all threads stopped.
I think instead of a notification mechanism access to the mark bit can be
provided.
The mark phase is ran with all thread paused, so you don't need any
notifications in that phase because nobody can ask the weak ref object for
the underlaying pointer then.
When threads are resumed, the mark phase is complete, so the invariant of
all live objects having the mark bit set and all the garbage having the
bit unset should hold. If the GC guarantee that the mark bit is set
*always* when a object is live (the mark bit clearing should be done with
all threads stopped and that should be it), except only when the mark
phase is running, then, a weak ref implementation can look at the mark bit
to safely see if the reference is garbage or not (even before the sweep
phase find it and call the finalizer).
I think this approach is both simple and efficient, it doesn't have races
at all (unless I'm missing something, of course). The only problem is it's
too tied to the current GC implementation. But I think any weak ref
implementation will, so it looks like weak ref really belong to the GC.
--
Leandro Lucarella (luca) | Blog colectivo: http://www.mazziblog.com.ar/blog/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
no longer afraid of the dark or midday shadows
nothing so ridiculously teenage and desperate,
nothing so childish - at a better pace,
slower and more calculated,
no chance of escape,
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list