Fixing the imaginary/complex mess

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

Robert Fraser wrote:
> Putting it in a library eliminates the ability to use complex/imaginary 
> literals (unless it's a runtime type).

Yah, but then I'm thinking: how many numeric literals are in a program 
at all? I think the vision of the mad scientist that uses one imaginary 
literal every five lines of code is quite unreal :o).

Andrei