My body is ugly [Re: Contextualizing keywords]
grauzone
none at example.net
Mon Aug 3 23:50:23 PDT 2009
Michel Fortin wrote:
> Also, I wonder why we need braces everywhere in contracts. I'd like it
> if I could write:
>
>
> int test(int i)
> in
> assert(i > 1);
> out (z)
> assert(z < 0);
> do
> return -i + 1;
Just bikeshedding a bit around... why not make it even simpler, and just
leave away the body/do completely? That would finally be a syntax I'd be
happy with. It wouldn't destroy the normal code layout too, because
in/out contracts are fully additional syntax.
int test(int i)
in assert(i > 1);
out(z) assert(z < 0);
{ return -i + 1; }
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list