Exponential operator
bearophile
bearophileHUGS at lycos.com
Fri Aug 7 04:42:07 PDT 2009
Lars T. Kyllingstad:
> He also proposed that the overload be called opPower.
I want to add to two small things to that post of mine:
http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=95123
The name opPow() may be good enough instead of opPower().
And A^^3 may be faster than A*A*A when A isn't a simple number, so always replacing the power with mults may be bad. On the other hand if double^^2 is compiled as pow(double,2) then I'm not going to use ^^ in most of my code.
Bye,
bearophile
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list