The future of D 1.x

[Dominik]

"Lutger" <lutger.blijdestijn at gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:h68ngs$1efm$1 at digitalmars.com...
> Though they overlap, phobos and tango do have different scopes and 
> somewhat
> different programming styles.

I understand taht completeley. I was more making a general statement that 
one of the reasons I am not considering D2 because of Tango being D1 only.

> Would you consider using D2 if Tango was available for it?

I would quite possibly consider it then since I believe fully in the 
competence of Tango people - their work has proven me that they know their 
stuf and I use Tango exclusively (I've started first with D1/Phobos). Tango 
not being available for D2 yet sends mixed signals - it is either that D2 is 
not considered stable yet for any effort of making a D2 version yet, or D2 
is considered not good from the perspective of D1 users.

I have dabbled a bit with D2 and it seems like a different language to me, 
but if Tango would be available for D2 - that would signal me that people 
that I trust and are more competent than me to judge a language are 
confident in D2 enough, so there would be much more reason for me to go 
through with it.