yank '>>>'?

[Don]

Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> D has operator >>> which means "unsigned shift to the right", inherited 
> from Java. But it doesn't need it because D has unsigned types, which 
> can be used to effect unsigned shift. (Java, lacking unsigned types, had 
> no other way around but to define a new operator.)
> 
> Should we yank operator>>>?
> 
> 
> Andrei

Yes. It's an operation that doesn't make much sense -- it operates on 
raw bits, not on integers. It's tied to a twos-complement 
representation, and not to mathematics. If you ever try to implement >>> 
for bigints, you find out how wierd it is.
I guess in the Java case, x>>>1 is cast(int)((cast(uint)x)>>1)
and there's no other way of doing it in a language which had no unsigned 
types.
It had some merit before D had templates. Now, I don't think it has much 
use.