No D in Great Computer Language Shootout?
Isaac Gouy
igouy2 at yahoo.com
Thu Dec 17 08:51:42 PST 2009
merlin wrote:
> do you think that D2 would be worth including at some point in the
> future if we had some benchmark implementations showing off some of it's
> more functional nature?
Last year I quadrupled what I have to do: by making measurements on 4 different
cpu/os configurations - x86 x64 quad-core one-core.
To reduce what I have to do: I asked - Can I think of reasons /not to include/
such and such a language implementation?
Common sense tells me not to include more languages, curiosity and fun tell me to
include just this one more - I'm trying /not to include/ more languages.
There seems to be a D benchmarking project
http://dbench.octarineparrot.com/
Couldn't that be more of a community project, extended, kept up to date, optimized
for search engines, ...
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list