Tuples
BCS
ao at pathlink.com
Fri Feb 6 11:54:37 PST 2009
Reply to dsimcha,
> I've been thinking a little about the idea of returning tuples from
> functions, w.r.t. Bugzilla 2628
> (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2628). Would it be
> feasible to solve this by making struct[index] for any struct w/o an
> opIndex overload equivalent to struct.tupleof[index]? This would be
> trivial syntactic sugar, but would allow user-defined tuples in Phobos
> to look like a builtin tuple, be returned from functions, etc., while
> changing very little under the hood. Furthermore, for functions that
> take a tuple, we could allow structs to be implicitly cast to tuples,
> e.g.:
>
> struct Foo {
> uint u;
> float f;
> }
> void doStuff(uint myInt, float myFloat) {}
>
> Foo foo;
> doStuff(foo); // Implicitly casts to foo.tupleof, works.
I like the first part some (but not without reservations). As for the second
bit... I don't like it. It would make overload resolution to tricky, if not
at the compiler level than at the eyeball level.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list