The path to unity

[Sean Kelly]

== Quote from Bill Baxter (wbaxter at gmail.com)'s article
> On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 1:54 AM, grauzone <none at example.net> wrote:
> >> Hmmmmm.  Name for a common namespace...... How about.... "common".
> >
> > Every time you introduce a new standard namespace, a bunch of innocent
> > existing D programs might become invalid.
> >
> I do in fact have a top level package called "common" where I put a
> bunch of code that is common to my various projects.   But I would
> happily rename it in a heartbeat if it meant greater unification
> between Phobos and Tango.  'Tis a small price to pay.

druntime already has "core", is there truly a need for a second top-level
namespace?