Old problem with performance

[Weed]

Daniel Keep пишет:
> Weed wrote:
>> [snip]
> 
> If I had to take a guess, I'd say that it's six times slower because
> you're performing 100 million allocations.  You aren't benchmarking
> class/struct overhead, you're benchmarking the overhead of doing 100
> million allocations.
> 
> You're comparing apples and heffalumps.

Yes, but problem is that D does not leave  way to create a class
instance without allocation