Old problem with performance

[Denis Koroskin]

On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 23:45:41 +0300, naryl <cy at ngs.ru> wrote:

> Denis Koroskin Wrote:
>> And here are results (best/average of 3 runs):
>>
>> DMD2.023 - 12.492/12.576 ms (-O -inline)
>> DMC8.42n - 13.941/14.131 ms (-O -inline)
>>
>>
>
> The only explanation I see is gcc does some optimization that dmd  
> backend doesn't.

Yes, that's why you can't claim D is slow because GCC outperforms DMD.