OT -- Re: random cover of a range

[Yigal Chripun]

John Reimer wrote:
> Hello bearophile,
>
>> (And my name is bearophile, thank you).
>>
>> Bye,
>> bearophile
>
>
> I'm curious to know what "bearophile" means?
>
>
> At first, I thought this alias was innocent enough, but after visiting
> your much promoted site (promoted in the D community), I'm not so sure
> what to think. I almost blanched at some of the content and greatly
> regretted having visited it.
>
>
> If you don't know what I'm talking about, then I ask you consider
> carefully the implications of some of your the creature fantasies that
> you blog about. I'm surprised nobody else has complained. Or maybe I
> should not be so surprised considering how politically incorrect it is
> to challenge any ideology (or fantasy, for that matter) even if it be so
> morally bankrupt so as to be considered extreme indeceny and deviance by
> any number of different cultural standards. The implications there as
> graphically displayed, while not quite clear, are in the direction of
> bestiality... and if not, are confused enough as to be presumptiously
> indifferent to any ethical question about the horrible nature of it.
>
>
> You are not doubt quite bright, as your other interests and
> participation in D design have made clearly evident. But I just can't
> believe such content is so closely linked to this group and the D design
> process. I should think you would be embarrassed. I know I am to have
> been subjected to it.
>
>
> If you're shocked that I'm confronting you openly on this, the reason
> lies squarely in the fact that you are boldly and unashamedly displaying
> the material in a site that is linked here multiple times; and I believe
> such boldness warrants the same measure of confrontation in return. I
> hope you will change your mind about the material. I'd wish both your
> mind on the matter and the material would completely change, but I don't
> have the right to request much more than that you disassociate it
> completely with your dealings with D, so that those it concerns don't
> have to be involved in the particulars of your fantasies whenever you
> link your site here.
>
>
> Of course, it is equally people's right here to support you in your
> freedom to display such things (while providing the links here). If they
> do, however, it speaks volumes about peoples general apathy to the
> downward spiral of society where increasingly indecent content is seen
> as normal and harmless. This is a great shame, and I'd be sorry to see
> that people don't care anymore.
>
>
> For those that see this as flamebait, I request that you do not respond.
> I just felt somebody had to say something about this. If this is
> perceived to be libelous, I ask that you consider carefully how damaging
> your content is to others, and the feelings it might engender in its
> viewers. Thus, you should recognize that this post merely elucidates on
> what's already evident.
>
>
> -JJR
>
>

What content are you refering to? I don't know Italian, but I didn't see 
anything like what you imply in English.