OT -- Re: random cover of a range

[Don]

John Reimer wrote:
> Hello bearophile,
> 
>> (And my name is bearophile, thank you).
>>
>> Bye,
>> bearophile

> At first, I thought this alias was innocent enough, but after visiting 
> your much promoted site (promoted in the D community), I'm not so sure 
> what to think.  I almost blanched at some of the content and greatly 
> regretted having visited it.
> 
> Of course, it is equally people's right here to support you in your 
> freedom to display such things (while providing the links here).  If 
> they do, however, it speaks volumes about peoples general apathy to the 
> downward spiral of society where increasingly indecent content is seen 
> as normal and harmless. This is a great shame, and I'd be sorry to see 
> that people don't care anymore.

John, I think you make a valid point that the D community should check 
that any site which is officially linked to, provides reasonable 
indication when you are leaving the technical section, particularly when 
there's potential for offense. (For example, linking to a terrorist 
website might be damaging for D).

But in other respects, if you're arguing from a Christian perspective, I 
don't see how bearophile's apparent acknowledgement of the truth of 
Romans 1 is anything but beneficial. He's no different from any of us. 
Rom 3:23.

-Don.