DMD 1.039 slowness...
Bill Baxter
wbaxter at gmail.com
Sun Feb 15 17:43:44 PST 2009
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Walter Bright
<newshound1 at digitalmars.com> wrote:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
>>
>> DMD 1.038/1.039 slowness is still there in DMD 1.040.
>>
>> A 1 minute build with 1.037 turns into
>> a >12 minute build with 1.040 (not sure how long exactly, I got bored
>> waiting to send this email)
>
> I don't know why that might be, so I need an example.
It's still chugging after more than an hour here, but mem use is
steady at 143,828K. So it may just be caught in an infinite loop.
I have a little more time now then when this first came up, so I'll
see if I can come up with some kind of repro.
>> Also this change:
>> * Separated bin and lib directories into windows, linux, and osx.
>>
>> while probably for the better, is likely to break a lot of installers
>> and install instructions that people have written for DMD.
>>
>> It broke the post-install scripts I always run after installing a new
>> DMD, and means I will need to update the path to DMD in various
>> places.
>
> I know and I'm sorry about that, but I don't see a better way moving
> forward.
Maybe just put it in bold or something in the change log? Or put
"WARNING:" in front of it? I saw it there, but it totally did not
jump out at me as something meant my normal operating procedures would
all be broken.
--bb
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list