Is str ~ regex the root of all evil, or the leaf of all good?
Denis Koroskin
2korden at gmail.com
Thu Feb 19 05:34:30 PST 2009
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:00:42 +0300, Christopher Wright
<dhasenan at gmail.com> wrote:
> Denis Koroskin wrote:
>> "abracazoo".match("a[b-e]", "g") is as short as "abracazoo" ~
>> regex("a[b-e]", "g") but doesn't existing conventions. I prefer it over
>> '~' version. In is also fine (both ways).
>
> This isn't so good for two reasons.
> First, I can't reuse regexes in your way, so if there is any expensive
> initialization, that is duplicated.
>
> Second, I can't reuse regexes in your way, so I have to use a pair of
> string constants.
auto re = regex("a[b-e]", "g");
foreach (e; "abracazoo".match(re)) {
// what's wrong with that?
}
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list