On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote: > Yah, ref on the callee side, or the [] operator without any arguments on the > caller side. Wait, what? I wouldn't have expected anything but "ref type[n] foo" on the function parameter to pass byref. What are you saying here?