__FUNCTION__

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

BCS wrote:
> Hello Andrei,
> 
>> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>
>>> Stdout.formatln("{}", __FUNCTION__);
>>
>> I think instead of __FUNCTION__ we'll define a much more comprehensive
>> static reflection facility.
>>
> 
> for the above case I think __FUNCTION__ is as good as it will get. 
> Define it as a human readable identifier rather than reflection.
> 
> 

You will have it as a human readable identifier too. The problem with
__FUNCTION__, __CLASS__ etc. is that the list of ad-hoc names (what
happened to __STRUCT__, __MODULE__ et al?) can go forever.


Andrei