dmd platform support - poll
K.Wilson
k.wilson at nospam.nowhere.com
Sun Jan 4 18:04:35 PST 2009
Daniel de Kok Wrote:
> On 2008-12-25 21:30:52 +0100, Walter Bright <newshound1 at digitalmars.com> said:
>
> > What platforms for dmd would you be most interested in using?
>
> In order of decreasing precedence:
>
> Mac OS X 64-bit Intel
> Linux x86_64
> Mac OS X 32-bit Intel
>
> I wouldn't use the other platforms much (if at all).
>
> Take care,
> Daniel
>
Just my two bits here. I would like to see Linux x86_64 support, above all else. I am the guy that added x64 support to ldc, solely because I have nothing but 64bit machines here ;)
This doesn't mean that I use the 64 bit address space and all those registers, and that I max out the system every day (as another part of this thread seems to indicate is a requirement????)...it just means that dmd wouldn't work on my machines and gdc didn't support/compile some code I was using. I needed a working compiler on x64 Linux and poking inside gdc is not my favorite activity, so I updated ldc.
Thanks,
K.Wilson
P.S. I also have access to a PPC Mac, so I guess that would be second on my list...I think Mac support in general would be nice.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list