Slow DWT compiles

[Nick Sabalausky]

"Bill Baxter" <wbaxter at gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:mailman.360.1231568636.22690.digitalmars-d at puremagic.com...
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Nick Sabalausky <a at a.a> wrote:
>> "Bill Baxter" <wbaxter at gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:mailman.355.1231561916.22690.digitalmars-d at puremagic.com...
>>> The DWT compile times do still seem to be sky-high even after the
>>> reversion in DMD 1.039.
>>>
>>> I just tried building the dwt-samples\treeeditor\Snippet111.d, for
>>> instance and it's taking insanely long.
>>>
>>> Switch back to DMD 1.037 and it compiles in well under a minute.
>>>
>>> So my guess is that nobody else but that one other poster has tried
>>> using DWT and DMD 1.039 together.
>>>
>>> Anyway, Walter, if you want a test case, install yerself a copy of
>>> tango and DWT and try dwt-samples\treeeditor\Snippet111.d  (or
>>> probably any other dwt snippet.  That's just the first one I tried).
>>>
>>> --bb
>>
>> Thought I'd add my experience, FWIW:
>>
>> I don't seem to have the treeeditor sample (maybe that's new in 3.4-2?), 
>> but
>> I tried dwt-samples\examples\simple.d:
>>
>> DMD 1.037 Tango 0.99.7 DWT 3.4-1 DSSS 0.76 (oneatatime=no):
>> dsss build -full simple
>> - Builds in 34 seconds
>>
>> Exactly the same thing but with DMD 1.039:
>> - Gives me a linker error after about 32 seconds:
>>
>> --------------------------------
>> simple.d => simple
>> +
>> D:\DevTool\dsss\bin\rebuild.exe -Idsss_imports\ -I. -S.\ -ID:\DevTool\dsss\include\d
>>  -SD:\DevTool\dsss\lib\ -full  -ID:\DevTool\dsss\include\d -SD:\DevTool\dsss\lib
>>  -oqdsss_objs\D -g -gc -JD:\DevTool\dsss\lib/res -J../res -I.. -L/SUBSYSTEM:console:5
>>  -L/rc:..\dwt simple.d -ofsimple
>>
>> OPTLINK (R) for Win32  Release 8.00.1
>> Copyright (C) Digital Mars 1989-2004  All rights reserved.
>> dsss_objs\D\dwt-graphics-Path.obj(dwt-graphics-Path)  Offset 0537DH 
>> Record
>> Type 0091
>>  Error 1: Previous Definition Different :
>> _D5tango4text4Text11__T4TextTaZ4Text4Span6__initZ
>> --- errorlevel 1
>> Command D:\DevTool\dsss\bin\rebuild.exe returned with code -1, aborting.
>
> I got that with the first DWT sample I tried too using 1.039 too.  37
> sec seems about right for how long it took to error out.
> That one was tree\Snippet15 I think.
> Then I tried the treeeditor one, and was taking a long time so I killed 
> it.
>
>> I may be using some sort of stange unsupported configuration though: I 
>> ended
>> up having to change three references in dwthelper from "tango.io." to
>> "tango.io.device."
>>
>> I'm not too concerned about the error at the moment, but I did think it 
>> was
>> significant that it got to the linking phase in roughly the same amount 
>> of
>> time as DMD 1.037. There seem to be some wildly inconsistent happenings 
>> in
>> regards to 1.039's DWT compile times. You're certain your "oneatatme"
>> setting didn't get reverted to on? Before I turned oneatatime off, both
>> versions of DMD took around 15 minutes or so.
>
> Yes I'm sure I've got oneatatime off.  All I'm doing to switch DMD
> configs is to unzip the new DMD files on top of the old installation,
> and run my "usetango.bat" script to fix it up after that.
>
> That script definitely isn't smart enough to do something different
> based on the current version of DMD installed.  So I'm positive that
> I'm using the same DSSS config for 1.037/1.038/1.039.
>
> --bb

Ok, I found the examples you were talking about, they were in 
"dwt-samples\snippets", not "dwt-samples\examples". I'm getting the same 
results as you for both "tree\Snippet15.d" and "treeeditor\Snippet111.d". 
Both compile fine in just over 30 sec on 1.037. On 1.039 "tree\Snippet15.d" 
fails after about 30 sec with the same link error I posted above, and 
"treeeditor\Snippet111.d" goes on for at least 10 minutes (that's when I 
killed it).