Profiler Speed
Tim M
a at b.com
Fri Jan 16 00:40:03 PST 2009
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:18:46 +1300, bearophile <bearophileHUGS at lycos.com>
wrote:
> Bill Baxter:
>> That's a good point. I never think of stuff like that because I use
>> dsss most of the time.
>> You want per-file flags? Ha! Dsss laughs at you. Unfortunately. :-(
>
> I usually compile programs with bud, that applies the same thing to all
> modules. I presume as dsss.
> As soon as Walter realizes that's a quite natural way to use D (that is,
> to let something (possibly the compiler) find the modules it needs by
> itself. LDC may eventually grow this essential feature), he may think
> about ways to influence the compiler from the code itself, creating
> compiler directives that can be embedded in the code (as in Pascal).
> I am not sure this is the best good solution, maybe there are better
> solutions, like improving those tools (or the compiler) to allow a finer
> specification of the compilation flags.
>
> Bye,
> bearophile
Is bud still maintained or is 11 month gaps between changes in /trunk
normal?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list