Any chance to call Tango as Extended Standard Library

[Lars Ivar Igesund]

Piotrek wrote:

> Hello!
> 
> It's just an idea. After reading about issues on disallowing DWT to stay
> in standardization area (Anomaly on Wiki4D GuiLibraries page) some
> question appeared in my mind. For propaganda sake isn't it better to not
> make such a big division between phobos and tango in the module naming?
> Logically:
> 
> phobos -> std
> tango  -> stdex (not tango -> tango)

Tango will stay Tango (and tango.*). The above naming assumes that Tango will depend on Phobos, and it will not.

-- 
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi
Dancing the Tango