Please vote once and for good: range operations

[Joel C. Salomon]

Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> That's a good point, but... we are at liberty to choose ANY names we 
> please. Is this weird "first"/"next" combo our best shot?


Has “current” been suggested?

How many terms are needed? Of the ordinals {first, previous, current, 
next, last}, however they are named, are any not needed? Are any more 
needed? randomth? nth?

—Joel Salomon