Number literals (Was: Re: Case Range Statement ..)
BCS
none at anon.com
Tue Jul 7 21:22:42 PDT 2009
Hello Andrei,
> Derek Parnell wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:08:55 -0400, bearophile wrote:
>>
>>> Nick Sabalausky:
>>>
>>>> why in the world is anyone defending the continued existance of
>>>> "5." and ".5"?<
>>>>
>>> I'm for disallowing them; 5.0 ad 0.5 are better.
>>> Anyone else pro/against this idea?
>> I would not complain if trailing dot and leading dot were disallowed.
>>
> I think the question that should be asked is: would anyone complain if
> they were kept? We have bigger rocks to move than that one.
>
> Andrei
>
Dropping them makes lexing cleaner: strictly "5..5" should lex as "5." ".5"
based on maximal munch ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximal_munch )
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list