Number literals (Was: Re: Case Range Statement ..)
Leandro Lucarella
llucax at gmail.com
Wed Jul 8 06:58:03 PDT 2009
Jarrett Billingsley, el 7 de julio a las 23:40 me escribiste:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Walter
> Bright<newshound1 at digitalmars.com> wrote:
> > Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> >>
> >> Totally agree. They're cruft that just complicate lexical analysis.
> >
> > Not a significant issue, as the code to lex it is done, works, and is
> > readily available.
>
> I'm not going to argue this anymore.
I will =)
That's not a good enough reason. Having *one* front-end
(lexer/parser/semantic analizer) is not good enough. D was supposed to
make this easy to encourage different implementations. If the D specs are
twisted and making a new lexer is... confusing, I think that's a failure.
--
Leandro Lucarella (luca) | Blog colectivo: http://www.mazziblog.com.ar/blog/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FALTAN 325 DIAS PARA LA PRIMAVERA
-- Crónica TV
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list