Number literals (Was: Re: Case Range Statement ..)

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

grauzone wrote:
>>> Compatibility with C is paramount, except when it's not.
>>
>> You didn't understand. Compatibility with C is important in the sense
>> that we want to have a clean-cut answer to a function rsa_encrypt()
>> taken from C and pasted into D: either it compiles and runs with the
>> same result, or it doesn't compile. That's the scenario. I don't
>> understand how you make a case of duplicity out of this one.
> 
> Eh. You know, we have something like... what was it called? Link 
> compatibility to C!
> 
> Also, your paragraph about superdude shows that you just can't forgot 
> about people who aren't as awesome as you and who attacked you in one 
> way or another. Learn to be more like Walter, or you'll piss off even 
> more people. I mean, you don't want that, and the community doesn't want 
> that either.

*cough* pot *cough* kettle *cough* black... :o)

Andrei