Case Range Statement ..

[Jarrett Billingsley]

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Walter
Bright<newshound1 at digitalmars.com> wrote:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
>>
>> If it's internal to the parse tree can't you make the syntax whatever you
>> want?
>> Something like (expr1 __exprSequencer expr2) should do just fine, right?
>> No reason it has to be a precious one-character symbol syntax.
>
> What if you're writing a program that generates D code?

..then you'd have it generate multiple statements?

Really, I'm not seeing the justification here!