Developing a plan for D2.0: Getting everything on the table

[Christian Kamm]

bearophile Wrote:
> - making D2 fitter for the LLVM back-end;

I do not think this is necessary. LDC can implement most 
of D1 just fine on top of LLVM. The omissions are minor:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc/wiki/Docs#Violationsofthespecification

Exposing particular features of the backend to the user 
should be done through compiler-specific extensions. See
http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc/wiki/InlineAsmExpressions
for an example.

Otherwise you'll make implementing a correct backend
for D even harder.