Dynamic D Library

[Jussi Jumppanen]

BCS Wrote:

> If I'm understanding the situation correctly, what you just 
> described is ONLY a problem on Windows and only because
> of a design flaw in the way DLL's work. 

That might be well be the case. 

But to basically then say that “when developing with D on Windows 
it is highly recommended that DLL's are not used” will just end up 
sounding like limitation of D and not of Windows DLLs.

Windows developers know languages like C/C++, C#, Visual Basic, in 
fact almost any language you care to name, have no trouble working 
with DLLs so the question they will be asking is why should D?