Developing a plan for D2.0: Getting everything on the table

[Benji Smith]

Jason House wrote:
> Other, less technical items:
> • A clear and "finalized" spec. If it isn't implemented, it should be yanked (or clearly marked as pending)
> • A plan for library support. Not just Tango, but also Phobos. D1 Phobos could not evolve.

In D1, I enthusiastically used Tango. I haven't used D2 yet (because all 
my code is heavily tied to the Tango libs), but I suspect that when D2 
is finalized, I'll port everything over to Phobos.

I've read all the Phobos2 development discussions here (most notably the 
range discussions), but what about the feature disparities between the 
two libraries. What types of functionality are currently present in 
Tango but absent in Phobos? Maybe if Andrei put together a list of 
missing Phobos functionality, we could get people from the community to 
flesh out the libs.

For example, I have a JSON parser implementation that I'd be happy to 
contribute.

--benji