Developing a plan for D2.0: Getting everything on the table
Andrei Alexandrescu
SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Wed Jul 22 19:03:56 PDT 2009
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:55:54 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
> <SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote:
>
>> I think we'd need at a minimum:
>
> what are your opinions on the I/O subsystem? I think a lot of
> performance/features could be gained by using D-based buffered I/O
> instead of the C standard lib. Tango is pretty much a testament to that...
Better speed is always nice, so it would be great to see some work in
that direction. What are the specific shortcomings that make using stdio
unrecommended?
Andrei
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list