new DIP5: Properties 2

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> Leandro Lucarella, el 27 de julio a las 11:15 me escribiste:
>>> If dip5 is as bad as opGet_foo is I'll delete it right now.
>> I think DIP5 should be removed, no matter how good or bad it is. If the
>> DIP has some consensus here, then somebody should add it to DIP4 as an
>> alternative.
> 
> And BTW, *please* add an author to the proposal!

It might be good to define a sort of an ombudsman for any given DIP. The 
ombudsman would collect suggestions by email or NG and fold the relevant 
ones in the DIP text.


Andrei