[~OT] Finally, a clear, concise D spec!

[Ellery Newcomer]

Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Daniel
> Keep<daniel.keep.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sorry, but you can't seriously claim D is still easy to implement whilst
>> .stringof still exists in its current form.  :P
> 
> Oh, .stringof is nothing compared to the complexity added by string mixins ;)
> 
> Or some of the scarier parsing issues.  (Type).Identifier and the (int
> x) { return x + 5; } delegates are two things that come to mind..

What's up with the last two? I haven't quite gotten to them in semantic
yet, but I didn't notice any problems in parsing them