D Framework

[teo]

On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:55:17 +0200, Lutger wrote:

> Sorry for the rant, I just think phobos as is developing is superior to
> the .NET framework and has a much cooler name too :) Same goes for
> Tango, albeit quite different design than phobos, it's very good too and
> beats .NET hands down. Also, Tango has a better name.

Well, they both have only cool names. Reading the newsgroups shows that 
they are incomplete and buggy. I tried Tango a bit and at many places 
noticed problems. Phobos was ok last time I used it (two years ago), but 
I did simple stuff.

Anyway I don't want to offend anyone here. I read that Andrei is 
redesigning Phobos and I am sure he will improve it. My point is however 
about having a meaningful library name.

PS: please don't take anything in my post personally.