Developing a plan for D2.0: Getting everything on the table
Sergey Gromov
snake.scaly at gmail.com
Tue Jul 28 15:10:06 PDT 2009
Mon, 27 Jul 2009 07:59:40 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> Is it appropriate to define multiple classes, structs, templates, etc
>> within a single module? What considerations should inform the decision
>> regarding the placement of module boundaries?
>
> I think it's appropriate because many pieces of functionality come as a
> bundle. The rule of thumb is, module provides the functionality, and
> it's up to the designer to decide what that entails.
That's the problem. On one hand, it's desirable to see a module as a
functionality bundle. On the other hand, module is the smallest
available unit of encapsulation. That is, if you have a class and
change its private implementation, this may affect *anything* in the
same module. Hence Tango's hundreds of modules in dozens of packages, I
think.
It also adds to the problem that most people familiar with OO paradigm
consider classes to be such encapsulation units. Surprizes are
inevitable.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list