Properties: .sort and .reverse

[KennyTM~]

Bill Baxter wrote:
> One more thing I'd like to mention regarding properties.
> 
> It has long annoyed me that .sort and .reverse are functions, but
> CANNOT be called like functions.
> So even if I'd like to make a distinction between properties and
> functions in my usage, I cannot with those two.  We should fix that.
> 
> I think they may both be headed for the chopping block, but if not we
> should fix em.
> 
> --bb

Better they should be functions in the standard library.