[~OT] Finally, a clear, concise D spec!

language_fan foo at bar.com.invalid
Wed Jul 29 07:03:44 PDT 2009


Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:55:40 -0400, Jarrett Billingsley thusly wrote:

> so its various
> introspection capabilities are kind of .. organically grown.
> ... 
> __traits is ugly only because W wanted it to be.

Good points.. that could also be the case. Now that the D 2.0 
specification has not been frozen yet, supposedly these kinds of issues 
could be solved before it is too late?



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list