Naming things: Phobos Programming Guidelines Propsal

[Michel Fortin]

On 2009-07-29 11:24:18 -0400, Ary Borenszweig <ary at esperanto.org.ar> said:

> Michel Fortin wrote:
>> I'd go with "ConnectAction" to make sure there's a noun. The rule 
>> following the "don't repeat the base class name" one is aimed at 
>> allowing this specific usage. It says:
>> 
>> """
>> It is fine to repeat the base type name in the derived type name if the 
>> derived type is only a specialization having the same function:
>> 
>>     class RemoteObject : Object { } // right
>>     class TcpSocket : Socket { }    // right
>> """
>> 
>> Obviously it doesn't seem too well worded. Any alternative suggestion?
> 
> I like it like that. It's a good rule. :)

I added your ConnectAction example, this way there is an example with a 
verb in front of a noun.

-- 
Michel Fortin
michel.fortin at michelf.com
http://michelf.com/