Yet a new properties proposal

[Robert Fraser]

Dimitar Kolev wrote:
> Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
> 
>> I don't see what advantages this has over other proposals.  What is wrong  
>> with a.a such that we have to resort to a#a?
>>
>> -Steve
>>
> 
> People are crying over compilers not know which is a property and which is not.

Actually, one of the major "features" of properties is that any field 
can be changed into a property without any changes to existing code.

If you're looking for an unused symbol, @ is likely a better choice than #.