Yet a new properties proposal

[Steven Schveighoffer]

On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:33:29 -0400, Dimitar Kolev  
<DimitarRosenovKolev at hotmail.com> wrote:

I'm not getting your example...

>
>> Different example:
>>
>> class plane
>> {
>>     bool fly = false;
>>     bool fly()
>>     {
>>          if (fly == false) return false;
>>
>>          // code for flying.
>>          // If it breaks for some reason
>>          return false;
>>
>>          // else return that everything is okay.
>>
>>          return true;
>>     }
>> }
>>
>> class pilot
>> {
>>       if (myPlane.fly)
>>          myPlane.fly;
>> }
>>
>> So this becomes:
>>
>> class plane
>> {

Is this a property or a field?  If it's a property, where is the code for  
the property?  If it's a field, then.... um I have no idea what you are  
saying.  Mark all fields with @?
>>     bool @fly = false;

This is a function or a property?
>>     bool fly()
>>     {
>>          if (@fly == false) return false;
>>
>>          // code for flying.
>>          // If it breaks for some reason
>>          return false;
>>
>>          // else return that everything is okay.
>>
>>          return true;
>>     }
>> }
>>
>
> class pilot
> {
>        plane @myPlane;
>

Huh?  What are you doing here, there is no return value...
>        plane myPlane()
>        {
>               @myPlane = new plane();
>        }
>
>        bool fly()
>        {
>               if (@myPlane == null)
>                     myPlane();
>

Does this use the field or the property of the plane?  Or is there a field?
>               if (@myPlane at fly == false)
>                   @myPlane at fly = true;
>
>               @myPlane.fly;
>        }
> }

Still confused....

-Steve