True Properties Poll

Jesse Phillips jessekphillips at gmail.com
Fri Jul 31 18:04:39 PDT 2009


On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:49:55 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:

> The syntax is an important part.  For example, you cited that as the
> main reason why you wouldn't want property syntax:
> 
>> I find writing
>>  property int foo { get; set;}
>>  More work than
>>  public int foo;
> 
> And I assume you meant public int foo() and public int foo(int value),
> since public int foo is a field.

You assume incorrectly. Some other post covered that.

> 
> But what about changing:
> 
> public int foo();
> public int foo(int value);
> 
> to
> 
> property:
>    public int foo();
>    public int foo(int value);
> 
> ???
> 
> -STeve

What I want is for += ... to be resolved, if it has to be done with 
"properties" then fine, hence how I voted.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list