D Wiki
Andrei Alexandrescu
SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Tue Jun 9 13:54:42 PDT 2009
Brad Roberts wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Yigal Chripun wrote:
>
>> J?r?me M. Berger wrote:
>>> yigal chripun wrote:
>>>> the difference is in the UI (which a wiki doesn't provide) and the format
>>>> used, i.e. not some wiki format.
>>>>
>>> 38 out of 57 of the wikis presented on the Wikipedia comparison page (*)
>>> are listed as having a stable WYSIWYG editor (some of the others are listed
>>> as having an alpha or beta one)...
>>>
>>> Jerome
>>>
>>> (*) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_wiki_software
>> if these wikies provide a wysiwyg editor than what's the point of not using
>> the standard HTML format as the backend?
>
> In an attempt to help this thread end...
>
> Thanks, the bicycle shed is a nice pretty new color and doesn't need any
> more paint.
>
> Sigh,
> Brad
>
> (Why is it that people can't stick to the original question and avoid the
> 100% pointless side discussion? No, really, don't answer that)
Consider yourself lucky. At least in this case people don't come with
their *own* wiki format. Compare and contrast with the endless recent
discussion on how switch should look like...
Andrei
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list