Suggestion: Syntactic sugar for Exception handling in D2

[Daniel Keep]

Michiel Helvensteijn wrote:
> Daniel Keep wrote:
> 
>> I like the idea from a DRY perspective.
> 
> How so? I don't see anything 'repeated' in the before-case.

The 'try' keyword is redundant.  The presence of any number of catches
or a finally indicates that the block must trap exceptions.  If there
are no catches or a finally, then a try by itself would be pointless.