Bug in std.range.retro?
Daniel Keep
daniel.keep.lists at gmail.com
Mon Jun 22 18:11:30 PDT 2009
Sam Hu wrote:
> Originally I posted in learn:
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D.learn&article_id=16913
>
> Move here to double confirm whether it is a bug:
> static if (isRandomAccessRange!(R) && hasLength!(R))
> ref ElementType!(R) opIndex(uint n)
> {
> return _input[_input.length - n + 1];
> }
>
> Shouldn't it be _input.length-(n+1) ?
>
> Regards,
> Sam
Well r[0] would translate to r.opIndex(0) which means it will return
r._input[r._input.length - 0 + 1] = r._input[r._input.length + 1] which
is outside the array bounds.
So yes, it's a bug.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list