Null references (oh no, not again!)

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

Denis Koroskin wrote:
> Nullable types may and should be implemented as a library type, with a 
> little of syntax sugar.

Too much syntactic sugar causes cancer of the semicolon.

This is exactly the kind of thing that goes forever and never stops. 
Changing the default to non-null is one good thing. Adding sugar in the 
mix just spoils everything.


Andrei