important proposal: scope keyword for class members

[Sean Kelly]

John Simon wrote:
> I'd like to propose a new use for the 'scope' keyword within an aggregate body.
> 
> Members of class type declared with the scope keyword are allocated not as references or pointers, but initialized directly inside the container.  Instead of a default initializer of 'null', it will initialize with the default constructor of the class, or an optional assignment after the declaration. Any 'new [type]' within the assignment will resolve to a simple call to the type's __ctor, instead of a memory allocation.

A while back, Walter said that he planned to do exactly this.  I'm not 
sure what the timetable is though, or if plans have changed.