eliminate writeln et comp?

[Walter Bright]

Georg Wrede wrote:
> Even if this includes "awkward things" (like having to have a constant 
> string in the binary, mentioning Tango in the "About" menu item, or 
> whatever else), it should be stated in layman-understandable terms.
> 
> Currently, words like "encumbrance", phrases like "provides broad 
> rights" etc. only make the prospective reader run away in frustration. 
> Just state what you want, in language that can be understood at First 
> Reading, without asking your mother. Or both of you having an IQ of 170+.


Having been involved with occasional contract disputes, I concur that 
the simpler and more obvious the language is, the better (and the lower 
your lawyer bill is :-) ).