Precedence of 'new' vs '.'

[Ary Borenszweig]

Frank Benoit escribió:
> In Java one can write:
> 
> new MyClass().run();
> 
> in D this does not compile, parenthesis are needed.
> 
> (new MyClass()).run();
> 
> But why is the D language designed like that?

I think it's because the (already hated by many, including myself) 
ability to invoke a function (or a constructor) without parenthesis.

So:
   new MyClass.run
and
   new MyClass().run

should be the same, right?

But in the first case MyClass could be a package name and you are 
constructing a new "MyClass.run" instance. You could make them behave 
differently, but some would say it's not consistent, etc.